Post by tomis42 on Feb 15, 2024 6:28:14 GMT
Sali Berisha was found again this Monday at the head of the group that ignites flames in the parliament, while he had to comply with the appearance order, according to the decision of the Special Court. It's been a month and a half since SPAK and then the court made the decision to seize the passport and restrict the movement of the opposition leader, as accused of passive corruption in the case of the privatization of the former club Partizani, which the former prime minister is challenging in open way them. Berisha has publicly declared, in a provocative manner, that he does not recognize and does not respect this illegal decision and in violation of the constitution according to him.
But the new justice bodies are Hungary Phone Number List convinced that they have strictly implemented the law and that they should not have received approval from the parliament for these soft restrictions that they want to apply to an elected deputy. So here we are at a point where each side defends its own logic. But, while Berisha goes to the end of his reasoning, ignoring the decisions of justice, the latter seems to be caught in a trap. Normally, SPAK and the Court, if they were really convinced that they are right, would have to ask for a more severe measure against Berisha. This is the usual practice towards a citizen who challenges the decisions. SPAK and the Special Court should be all the more diligent, when it is known that they were established to prevent the inviolables from being ignored in relation to justice.
When their existence is precisely related to the end of the cult of impunity. To return to the specific case, if they felt disregarded by Berisha, they should have automatically sought an arrest warrant for him, if only to put the law in place, if only to make an example that with this Euro-Atlantic justice, the characters of the past can no longer behave the same as with that predecessor. Therefore, the question that everyone would logically ask is: why don't they take a more serious measure, why don't they arrest Saliu? Read also: The incinerator of Tirana, Kelliçi: Let SPAK sleep, we will track the money Protest of February 20, Berisha: Wait for the Albanians Edi Rama, they will come In order to give an answer to this senseless dilemma, one must first know a fact, that in order to do this, SPAK must officially request the Assembly to vote for the removal of the MP's immunity.
But the new justice bodies are Hungary Phone Number List convinced that they have strictly implemented the law and that they should not have received approval from the parliament for these soft restrictions that they want to apply to an elected deputy. So here we are at a point where each side defends its own logic. But, while Berisha goes to the end of his reasoning, ignoring the decisions of justice, the latter seems to be caught in a trap. Normally, SPAK and the Court, if they were really convinced that they are right, would have to ask for a more severe measure against Berisha. This is the usual practice towards a citizen who challenges the decisions. SPAK and the Special Court should be all the more diligent, when it is known that they were established to prevent the inviolables from being ignored in relation to justice.
When their existence is precisely related to the end of the cult of impunity. To return to the specific case, if they felt disregarded by Berisha, they should have automatically sought an arrest warrant for him, if only to put the law in place, if only to make an example that with this Euro-Atlantic justice, the characters of the past can no longer behave the same as with that predecessor. Therefore, the question that everyone would logically ask is: why don't they take a more serious measure, why don't they arrest Saliu? Read also: The incinerator of Tirana, Kelliçi: Let SPAK sleep, we will track the money Protest of February 20, Berisha: Wait for the Albanians Edi Rama, they will come In order to give an answer to this senseless dilemma, one must first know a fact, that in order to do this, SPAK must officially request the Assembly to vote for the removal of the MP's immunity.